| HOME | HELP | E-MAIL ALERTS | SEARCH |
|
POLICY STATEMENT |
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: VKDB, vitamin K deficiency bleeding
| BACKGROUND |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Late VKDB, a syndrome defined as unexpected bleeding attributable to severe vitamin K deficiency in infants 2 to 12 weeks of age, occurs primarily in exclusively breastfed infants who have received no or inadequate neonatal vitamin K prophylaxis. In addition, infants who have intestinal malabsorption defects (cholestatic jaundice, cystic fibrosis, etc) may also have late VKDB. The rate of late VKDB (often manifesting as sudden central nervous system hemorrhage) ranges from 4.4 to 7.2 per 100 000 births, according to reports from Europe and Asia.2,3 When a single dose of oral vitamin K has been used for neonatal prophylaxis, the rate has decreased to 1.4 to 6.4 per 100 000 births. Parenteral neonatal vitamin K prophylaxis prevents the development of late VKDB in infants, with the rare exception of those with severe malabsorption syndromes.2
Oral administration of vitamin K has been shown to have efficacy similar to that of parenteral administration in the prevention of early VKDB.46 However, several countries have reported a resurgence of late VKDB coincident with policies promoting the use of orally administered prophylaxis, even with multiple-dose regimens. In a 1997 review of these experiences by Cornelissen et al,7 surveillance data from 4 countries revealed oral prophylaxis failures of 1.2 to 1.8 per 100 000 live births, compared with no reported cases after intramuscular administration. Newborns receiving incomplete oral prophylaxis tended to have a higher risk of developing VKDB, with rates of approximately 2 to 4 per 100 000. Small daily oral doses, as practiced in the Netherlands, may decrease the risk of late VKDB8 and approach the efficacy of the parenteral route; however, this needs to be better studied.
Draper and Stiller,9 using other data from Great Britain, have questioned the results of earlier studies of Golding et al10,11 that attempted to show an association between intramuscular vitamin K administration in newborns and an increased incidence of childhood cancer. Using data from the National Registry of Childhood Tumors, they estimated the cumulative incidence of childhood leukemia. Three sources of data, including the estimates from Golding et al, provided rates of intramuscular vitamin K use over the same time frame. Their analyses failed to show a correlation between increased use of intramuscular vitamin K and the incidence of childhood leukemia.
The Vitamin K Ad Hoc Task Force of the American Academy of Pediatrics12 reviewed the reports of Golding et al and other information regarding the US experience13 and concluded that there was no association between the intramuscular administration of vitamin K and childhood leukemia or other cancers.
Additional studies that have since been conducted by other investigators have not supported a clinical relationship between newborn parenteral administration of vitamin K and childhood cancer. Ross and Davies14 published a review of the evidence in 2000. They found no randomized or quasi-randomized evidence of an association between parenteral vitamin K prophylaxis and cancer in childhood. Ten case-control studies were identified, of which 7 found no relationship and 3 found only a weak relationship of neonatal administration of intramuscular or intravenous vitamin K with the risk of solid childhood tumors or leukemia.
Recent research on the pathogenesis of childhood leukemia additionally weakens the plausibility of a causal relationship between parenteral administration of vitamin K and cancer. Investigations by Wiemels et al15 suggest a prenatal origin of childhood leukemia. They found an acute lymphocytic leukemia-associated gene in 12 children with newly diagnosed acute lymphocytic leukemia and postulated that an in utero chromosomal translocation event combined with a postnatal promotional event results in clinical leukemia. Although intramuscular administration of vitamin K could conceivably be a postnatal promotional event, a genetic etiologic explanation further lessens the likelihood of a clinically significant relationship between intramuscular administration of vitamin K and leukemia.
There is concern that adequate vitamin K prophylaxis be provided to the increasing numbers of newborns who are breastfed exclusively to avoid an increased risk of late VKDB with its associated intracranial hemorrhage.7
| RECOMMENDATIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Committee on Fetus and Newborn, 20022003 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Daniel G. Batton, MD
Edward F. Bell, MD
William A. Engle, MD
William P. Kanto, Jr, MD
Gilbert I. Martin, MD
Warren Rosenfeld, MD
Ann R. Stark, MD
*Carol A. Miller, MD
Past Committee Member
| Liaisons |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Canadian Paediatric Society
Tonse Raju, MD, DCH
National Institutes of Health
Laura E. Riley, MD
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Kay M. Tomashek, MD
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Carol Wallman, MSN, RNC, NNP
National Association of Neonatal Nurses
Staff
Jim Couto, MA
*Lead author
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Statement of reaffirmation:
The following policy statement has been revised:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Busfield, A. McNinch, and J. Tripp Neonatal vitamin K prophylaxis in Great Britain and Ireland: the impact of perceived risk and product licensing on effectiveness Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 754 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Clarke, S. J. Mitchell, R. Wynn, S. Sundaram, V. Speed, E. Gardener, D. Roeves, and M. J. Shearer Vitamin K Prophylaxis for Preterm Infants: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3 Regimens Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): e1657 - e1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Section on Breastfeeding Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk Pediatrics, February 1, 2005; 115(2): 496 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Costakos, M. Porte, C. A. Miller, L. R. Blackmon, and On behalf of the Committee on Fetus and Newborn Did "Controversies Concerning Vitamin K and the Newborn" Cover All the Controversies? Pediatrics, May 1, 2004; 113(5): 1466 - 1467. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | E-MAIL ALERTS | SEARCH |