| HOME | HELP | E-MAIL ALERTS | SEARCH |
|
PEDIATRICS Vol. 106 No. 1 July 2000, pp. 138-142
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The newborn with abnormal genital development presents a difficult diagnostic and treatment challenge for the primary care pediatrician. It is important that a definitive diagnosis be determined as quickly as possible so that an appropriate treatment plan can be established to minimize medical, psychological, and social complications. The purpose of this review is to identify which newborns among those with abnormal genital development need to be screened for intersexuality, to outline the investigations necessary, and to suggest indications for referral to a center with experience in the diagnosis and management of these disorders. An outline is also presented of the embryology of the external genitalia indicating where errors can arise to provide a framework for pediatricians to use when counseling families. Although the focus of this review is on newborns with what has been termed "ambiguous genitalia," it should be recognized that most genital abnormalities in newborns do not result in an ambiguous appearance. These anomalies include hypospadias, in which the genitalia are clearly malformed, although the sex is unquestionably male.
The birth of a child with ambiguous genitalia constitutes a
social emergency. Because words spoken in the delivery room may have a
lasting impact on parents and their relationship with their infant, it
is important that no attempt be made to suggest a diagnosis or offer a
gender assignment. The infant should be referred to as "your baby"
or "your child" To explain to the family the cause of their newborn's genital
abnormalities, the practitioner needs to understand the genetic and
hormonal influences that are responsible for normal genital development. Before about 6 weeks' gestation, male and female embryos
develop undifferentiated gonadal tissue and have primordial structures
with the potential to produce either male or female genitalia. The
genital appearance of the newborn is largely determined by the presence
or absence of genetic and hormonal influences responsible for the
active process of male differentiation. The fetus tends to develop as a
female in the absence of these male influences. Intersex conditions
arise because of an abnormality along the male pathway that interferes
with complete masculinization or, in the case of a genetic female, some
virilizing influence that acts on the developing embryo.
Male sexual differentiation is initiated by the SRY gene on
the short arm of the Y chromosome. Under the influence of
SRY, the undifferentiated gonad forms a testis, which
produces the hormonal milieu that results in male sexual
differentiation: testosterone stimulates the wolffian
structures (epididymis, vas deferens, and seminal vesicles), and
anti-Müllerian hormone suppresses the development of the
Müllerian structures (fallopian tubes, uterus, and upper
vagina). The conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone occurs
in the skin of the external genitalia and masculinizes the external
genital structures. Most of this male differentiation takes place by
about 12 weeks, after which the penis grows and the testes descend into
the scrotum. In the absence of SRY, female sexual
differentiation occurs. An error in genital morphogenesis may occur at
any step in this developmental pathway.
Infants whose genitalia are obviously ambiguous are investigated
at birth so that sex of rearing can be assigned. In many cases,
however, appearances are deceptive. For example, an infant with what
appears to be bilateral cryptorchidism might be assumed to be a boy
because of a normal-appearing phallic structure but in fact may be a
girl with severe virilizing congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).
Similarly, an apparent female infant with only slight clitoral
hypertrophy may be a genetic male with severe androgen insensitivity,
necessitating eventual removal of the testicles to avoid malignant
degeneration. It is necessary, therefore, to have well-defined clinical
criteria for the investigation of intersexuality. To some extent these
criteria are arbitrary insofar as even the mildest degree of
hypospadias can be regarded as an example of incomplete
masculinization. However, the incidence of an identifiable abnormality
increases with the severity of the hypospadias1 or when 1 gonad is also undescended.2 The genital findings that
warrant investigation for intersexuality are given in Table
1. Note that 3 of these findings are seen
in infants who will initially be assumed to be boys, whereas another 3 arise in apparent girls. Only a minority of intersex patients have
genitalia that are so ambiguous that the sex is uncertain.
TABLE 1
not "it," "he," or "she." It is helpful to examine the child in the presence of the parents to demonstrate the precise abnormalities of genital development, emphasizing that the genitalia of both sexes develop from the same
primordial fetal structures, that both incomplete development or
overdevelopment of the external genitalia can occur, and that the
abnormal appearance can be corrected and the child raised as a boy or a
girl as appropriate. Parents should be encouraged not to name the child
or register the birth, if possible, until the sex of rearing is
established. As much as possible, the parents need to be included in
the discussions regarding sex of rearing. Each infant requires
individual consideration based on physical examination, laboratory
studies, and parental feelings. In many instances, transfer of the
child to a tertiary care facility is necessary for optimal assessment.
The emotional tone established by health care professionals in
conveying this information can have a lasting influence on how the
parents conceptualize the abnormal genital development. Therefore, a
positive atmosphere is essential for parents to begin their
relationship with their child.
![]()
UNDERSTANDING SEXUAL DIFFERENTIATION
![]()
WHICH NEWBORNS NEED INVESTIGATION?
Clinical Findings in a Newborn Infant That Raise the Possibility of
Intersexuality
These guidelines for investigation permit most newborns with an underlying intersex condition to be recognized promptly after birth. Other children with intersex disorders, however, may not be diagnosed until childhood or adolescence when virilization, premature pubarche or thelarche, or primary amenorrhea are investigated.
| |
THE HISTORY AND EXAMINATION |
|---|
Evaluation begins with an obstetric history to include any evidence of endocrine disturbance during pregnancy. A family history should be sought of unexplained neonatal deaths or genital anomalies, abnormal pubertal development, or infertility in close relatives. The physical examination begins with a search for any features suggestive of a malformation syndrome. The external genitalia are then inspected to determine the degree of masculinization. The size of the phallus is assessed by rolling the corporeal bodies between the fingers to appreciate their true length and girth, as both ventral curvature (chordee), which is almost always present, and an abundance of prepubic fat often mask the true size of the penis. In full-term newborns the stretched penile length should measure at least 2 cm.3 The extent to which the urogenital sinus has closed is then determined by identifying the position of the urethral meatus, which sometimes requires waiting until the baby voids. The fullness, symmetry, and rugosity of the labioscrotal folds are then noted. When these folds are asymmetrical, a gonad is frequently palpable on the more virilized side and is often associated with an inguinal hernia. An attempt should be made to palpate the gonads on each side by sweeping the examining fingers down along the line of the inguinal canal toward the labium or scrotum while the other hand grasps any possible gonad. This maneuver requires warm hands and considerable patience.
It is generally unwise at this stage to make a definitive diagnosis based on the physical findings alone, as the appearance of the external genitalia can vary widely, even among patients with the same underlying condition. There is only one deduction that can confidently be made, namely, that if a gonad is palpable the diagnosis is not a female infant with CAH in which the gonads are normal ovaries situated in the abdominal cavity. Some clues to help establish a diagnosis, however, may be found. For example, a well-developed phallus indicates that significant levels of circulating testosterone were present in utero, whereas asymmetry of the scrotum suggests the secretion of testosterone by the gonad on the better developed side. Other findings include dark skin pigmentation associated with high circulating levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone, suggesting CAH, or a virilized appearance of the mother resulting from placental aromatase deficiency or a maternal endocrine tumor.
| |
LABORATORY AND IMAGING STUDIES |
|---|
As CAH is the most common single cause of ambiguous genitalia in the newborn, a biochemical screen for this disorder should be performed in infants with symmetrical masculinization and nonpalpable gonads (Fig 1). Although the levels of 17-hydroxyprogesterone and androstenedione are greatly elevated in classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency, a more extensive panel is recommended so that the rarer forms of CAH are not overlooked (Fig 2). The infant's serum electrolyte levels should be determined immediately and followed closely until a diagnosis and treatment plan are established. Chromosome analysis should also be performed as an initial investigation. Results can usually be obtained within 72 hours by standard techniques or more rapidly by using a fluorescence in situ hybridization study. When the diagnosis of CAH is confirmed, further diagnostic testing is not necessary.
|
|
When 1 or both gonads are palpable or the CAH screen is negative, it is
necessary to investigate further, including a pelvic ultrasound
examination to identify a muscular uterine body and a genitogram to
identify a vagina, a uterine canal, 1 or 2 fallopian tubes, or the vasa
deferentia. A biochemical panel is also required to identify a block in
testosterone biosynthesis, decreased 5-
reductase activity, or
androgen insensitivity. If the results of these investigations do not
identify a definitive diagnosis, the appropriate sex of rearing may
nevertheless be obvious. However, at some point, inspection and biopsy
of the gonads become necessary to establish the diagnosis. These
in-depth investigations are usually done at a center that specializes
in the diagnosis and management of these disorders.
| |
THE CAUSES OF AMBIGUOUS GENITALIA |
|---|
Over the past few years rapid advances have been made in understanding the underlying genetic causes responsible for many of the intersex disorders. Conceptually, however, it is simplest to think of these causes in terms of the histology of the infant's gonads, which determines the prognosis with regard to fertility and pubertal development (Table 2). Certain gonads also carry an increased risk for malignant degeneration. A detailed discussion of the various disorders can be found in several excellent reviews.4,5
|
| |
DECIDING THE SEX OF REARING |
|---|
The decision as to the appropriate sex of rearing of a baby born with ambiguous genitalia is based on a number of considerations that have an impact on the infant's future.
Fertility Potential
All female infants virilized because of CAH or maternal androgens are potentially fertile and should therefore be raised as girls. In most other intersex conditions the potential for fertility is either reduced or absent.
Capacity for Normal Sexual Function
The size of the phallus and its potential to develop at puberty into a sexually functional penis are of paramount importance when one is considering male sex of rearing. Because of the difficulty assessing the potential for penile growth, particularly in those infants with partial androgen insensitivity, a trial of testosterone injections should be given in equivocal cases and the infant raised as a boy only when there is a very good response. The results of hypospadias repair by an experienced surgeon using current techniques are satisfactory, both cosmetically and functionally. The severity of the hypospadias should not, therefore, be a deciding factor in the sex of rearing. The presence of a capacious, low-lying vagina is advantageous if assignment as a female is being considered, but this alone is not of critical importance. A small, high-lying vagina presents more of a surgical challenge but this may be justified when such children are likely to be fertile.
Endocrine Function
The ability of the gonads to produce appropriate hormones for sex of rearing is a factor in sex assignment. It is therefore advantageous to retain a gonad appropriate to the assigned sex if it is likely to function adequately. Among the intersex disorders the ovaries of virilized genetic females can be assumed to be normal. Ovaries of true hermaphrodites may also produce adequate levels of estrogen. However, the testes of true hermaphrodites and those of infants with mixed gonadal dysgenesis may initially show good function that declines during childhood, so that testosterone supplements may be necessary for the establishment of puberty or in adult life.6
Malignant Change
The potential for malignant degeneration in a retained gonad with a Y chromosome-bearing cell line must be considered. Such changes are common in streak gonads in patients with a 46,XY cell line; streak gonads, therefore, should be removed at the time of diagnosis. Similarly, testes that show dysgenetic features on biopsy also need to be excised. The incidence of tumors is increased in histologically normal undescended testes, particularly those residing in the abdomen. However, a case can be made for retaining such a testis in patients with mild androgen insensitivity, true hermaphroditism, or mixed gonadal dysgenesis provided biopsy results show normal testicular tissue, the testis can easily be brought down into the scrotum, and the patient can be kept under long-term observation.
Testosterone Imprinting
Historically, it has been assumed that the psychosexual development of infants with an intersex disorder is largely the result of rearing rather than intrinsic. However, in the past decade it has become apparent that testosterone imprinting of the fetal brain may play a role in determining male sexual orientation. Clinical studies in girls with CAH have confirmed the widely held impression that such children engage in more typically male-like behavior patterns than their unaffected peers7 and occasionally may have difficulties with adjustment to their assigned gender.8 Nonetheless, it appears that the majority of such girls do not overtly demonstrate problems with sexual identity, although scientific studies are sparse. Until further data become available, caution should be exercised when a recommendation is made that the sex of rearing should differ from the chromosomal sex. Such cases warrant careful individual consideration. Psychological counseling of affected individuals and their parents may be beneficial.
Timing of Surgery
Infants raised as girls will usually require clitoral reduction which, with current techniques, will result not only in a normal-looking vulva but preservation of a functional clitoris. In girls with CAH, surgery can usually be performed once hormone replacement therapy is begun. A low-lying vagina can be exteriorized at the initial surgery, but in other cases this is best deferred until 1 year of age and often later. Additional surgery is often necessary. The testes should be removed soon after birth in infants with partial androgen insensitivity or testicular dysgenesis in whom a very small phallus mandates a female sex of rearing. In boys, an undescended testis that is to be retained is best brought down into the scrotum at the time of initial gonadal biopsy. Correction of chordee and urethroplasty in boys with hypospadias is usually performed between 6 and 18 months of age, usually in 1 stage as an outpatient procedure.
| |
FOLLOW-UP |
|---|
Because of remaining uncertainties with regard to the long-term psychological and physical aspects of treatment among these patients, ongoing counseling of the parents and the affected child is advisable. Although it appears that most individuals are able to function in the normal range and are well-adjusted, few studies have been done that address the social, psychological, and sexual outcomes for affected adolescents and adults. There has been considerable recent debate about the appropriate gender assignment of newborns with the most extreme forms of genital ambiguity, with some suggesting that the current early surgical treatment be abandoned in favor of allowing the affected person to participate in gender assignment at a later time.9 Although certain affected individuals will have conflicts between their psychosexual orientation and their genital appearance and function, the principles outlined in this review should minimize these problems when conducted by an appropriately constituted intersex team. When problems are apparent, help should be sought from psychologists, counselors, and other mental health professionals with experience in intersex disorders. Some families may benefit from speaking to others who have had similar experiences. Most genetic and endocrine centers are able to refer families to appropriate support groups, or the family can contact the National Organization of Rare Disorders (800/999-6673) or visit their Web site (www.rarediseases.org) for more information.
| |
CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although newborns with ambiguous genitalia are encountered rarely in a primary care pediatrician's practice, their diagnosis and prompt treatment require urgent medical attention. It is important to arrive at a definitive diagnosis so that an appropriate treatment plan can be developed, prognostic information shared, and accurate recurrence risk counseling communicated. The psychological distress that families feel during this time should be acknowledged. In some cases it will be necessary to assemble a team of specialists to perform these tasks in a timely, efficient manner. Pediatricians have a key role in this process by coordinating the diagnostic evaluation, helping families understand their child's medical condition, and maintaining open communication between the family and other health care team members.
COMMITTEE ON GENETICS, 1999-2000
Celia I. Kaye, MD, PhD, Chairperson
Christopher Cunniff, MD
Jaime L. Frias, MD
John Moeschler, MD
Susan R. Panny, MD
Tracy L. Trotter, MD
LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES
Felix de la Cruz, MD, MPH
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Sherman Elias, MD
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
James W. Hanson, MD
American College of Medical Genetics
Cynthia A. Moore, MD, PhD
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Michele Lloyd-Puryear, MD, PhD
Health Resources and Services Administration
SECTION REPRESENTATIVE
Beth A. Pletcher, MD
Section on Genetics and Birth Defects
CONSULTANTS
Ian Aaronson, MD
Franklin Desposito, MD
Peter Lee, MD
Selma Witchel, MD
STAFF
Lauri Hall
SECTION ON ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1999-2000
Robert P. Schwartz, MD, Chairperson
Inger L. Hansen, MD
Francine Kaufman, MD
Surendra Kumar Varma, MD
Sharon E. Oberfield, MD
Janet Silverstein, MD
LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES
Lynne L. Levitsky, MD
Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society
Michelle Reeves, RN, MN
Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society
STAFF
Tiffany Varchetto, RN
SECTION ON UROLOGY, 1999-2000
Ronald Rabinowitz, MD, Chairperson
John P. Gearhart, MD
Rafael Gosalbez, Jr, MD
James Mandell, MD
Gordon Arthur McLorie, MD
Craig Peters, MD
Richard C. Rink, MD
H. Gil Rushton, MD
Mark Zaontz, MD
EX-OFFICIO
Stephen A. Kramer, MD
STAFF
Kathy Ozmeral
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
CAH, congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following policy statement is a revision:
Statement of retirement:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Roen `But We Have to Do Something': Surgical `Correction' of Atypical Genitalia Body Society, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 47 - 66. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chi, H. C. Lee, and E. K. Neely Ambiguous Genitalia in the Newborn NeoReviews, February 1, 2008; 9(2): e78 - e84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Bostwick and K. A. Martin A Man's Brain in an Ambiguous Body: A Case of Mistaken Gender Identity Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 164(10): 1499 - 1505. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Longnecker, B. C. Gladen, L. A. Cupul-Uicab, S. P. Romano-Riquer, J.-P. Weber, R. E. Chapin, and M. Hernandez-Avila In Utero Exposure to the Antiandrogen 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE) in Relation to Anogenital Distance in Male Newborns from Chiapas, Mexico Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2007; 165(9): 1015 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Frader, P. Alderson, A. Asch, C. Aspinall, D. Davis, A. Dreger, J. Edwards, E. K. Feder, A. Frank, L. A. Hedley, et al. Health Care Professionals and Intersex Conditions Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2004; 158(5): 426 - 428. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Rangecroft Surgical management of ambiguous genitalia Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 799 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Blizzard Intersex Issues: A Series of Continuing Conundrums Pediatrics, September 1, 2002; 110(3): 616 - 621. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | E-MAIL ALERTS | SEARCH |