| HOME | HELP | E-MAIL ALERTS | SEARCH |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PEDIATRICS Vol. 100 No. 6 December 1997, pp. 1035-1039
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This policy statement on breastfeeding replaces the previous policy statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics, reflecting the considerable advances that have occurred in recent years in the scientific knowledge of the benefits of breastfeeding, in the mechanisms underlying these benefits, and in the practice of breastfeeding. This document summarizes the benefits of breastfeeding to the infant, the mother, and the nation, and sets forth principles to guide the pediatrician and other health care providers in the initiation and maintenance of breastfeeding. The policy statement also delineates the various ways in which pediatricians can promote, protect, and support breastfeeding, not only in their individual practices but also in the hospital, medical school, community, and nation.
From its inception, the American Academy of Pediatrics
(AAP) has been a staunch advocate of breastfeeding as the optimal form of nutrition for infants. One of the earliest AAP publications was a
1948 manual, Standards and Recommendations for the Hospital Care
of Newborn Infants. This manual included a recommendation to make
every effort to have every mother nurse her full-term infant. A major
concern of the AAP has been the development of guidelines for proper
nutrition for infants and children. The activities, statements, and
recommendations of the AAP have continuously promoted breastfeeding of
infants as the foundation of good feeding practices.
Extensive research, especially in recent years, documents diverse
and compelling advantages to infants, mothers, families, and society
from breastfeeding and the use of human milk for infant feeding. These
include health, nutritional, immunologic, developmental, psychological,
social, economic, and environmental benefits.
Human milk is uniquely superior for infant feeding and is
species-specific; all substitute feeding options differ markedly from
it. The breastfed infant is the reference or normative model against
which all alternative feeding methods must be measured with regard to
growth, health, development, and all other short- and long-term
outcomes.
Epidemiologic research shows that human milk and breastfeeding of
infants provide advantages with regard to general health, growth, and
development, while significantly decreasing risk for a large number of
acute and chronic diseases. Research in the United States, Canada,
Europe, and other developed countries, among predominantly
middle-class populations, provides strong evidence that human milk
feeding decreases the incidence and/or severity of
diarrhea,1-5 lower respiratory
infection,6-9 otitis media,3,10-14
bacteremia,15,16 bacterial meningitis,15,17 botulism,18 urinary tract infection,19 and
necrotizing enterocolitis.20,21 There are a number of
studies that show a possible protective effect of human milk feeding
against sudden infant death syndrome,22-24 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus,25-27 Crohn's
disease,28,29 ulcerative colitis,29
lymphoma,30,31 allergic diseases,32-34 and
other chronic digestive diseases.35-37 Breastfeeding has
also been related to possible enhancement of cognitive
development.38,39
There are also a number of studies that indicate possible health
benefits for mothers. It has long been acknowledged that breastfeeding
increases levels of oxytocin, resulting in less postpartum bleeding and
more rapid uterine involution.40 Lactational amenorrhea
causes less menstrual blood loss over the months after delivery. Recent
research demonstrates that lactating women have an earlier return to
prepregnant weight,41 delayed resumption of ovulation with
increased child spacing,42-44 improved bone
remineralization postpartum45 with reduction in hip
fractures in the postmenopausal period,46 and reduced risk
of ovarian cancer47 and premenopausal breast
cancer.48
In addition to individual health benefits, breastfeeding provides
significant social and economic benefits to the nation, including
reduced health care costs and reduced employee absenteeism for care
attributable to child illness. The significantly lower incidence of
illness in the breastfed infant allows the parents more time for
attention to siblings and other family duties and reduces parental
absence from work and lost income. The direct economic benefits to the
family are also significant. It has been estimated that the 1993 cost
of purchasing infant formula for the first year after birth was $855.
During the first 6 weeks of lactation, maternal caloric intake is no
greater for the breastfeeding mother than for the nonlactating
mother.49,50 After that period, food and fluid intakes are
greater, but the cost of this increased caloric intake is about half
the cost of purchasing formula. Thus, a saving of >$400 per child for
food purchases can be expected during the first year.51,52
Despite the demonstrated benefits of breastfeeding, there are some
situations in which breastfeeding is not in the best interest of the
infant. These include the infant with galactosemia,53,54 the infant whose mother uses illegal drugs,55 the infant
whose mother has untreated active tuberculosis, and the infant in the United States whose mother has been infected with the human
immunodeficiency virus.56,57 In countries with populations
at increased risk for other infectious diseases and nutritional
deficiencies resulting in infant death, the mortality risks associated
with not breastfeeding may outweigh the possible risks of acquiring
human immunodeficiency virus infection.58 Although most
prescribed and over-the-counter medications are safe for the breastfed
infant, there are a few medications that mothers may need to take that
may make it necessary to interrupt breastfeeding temporarily. These
include radioactive isotopes, antimetabolites, cancer chemotherapy
agents, and a small number of other medications. Excellent books and
tables of drugs that are safe or contraindicated in breastfeeding are
available to the physician for reference, including a publication from
the AAP.55
Increasing the rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration is a
national health objective and one of the goals of Healthy People 2000. The target is to "increase to at least 75% the proportion of mothers
who breastfeed their babies in the early postpartum period and to at
least 50% the proportion who continue breastfeeding until their babies
are 5 to 6 months old."59 Although breastfeeding rates have increased slightly since 1990, the percentage of women currently electing to breastfeed their babies is still lower than levels reported in the mid-1980s and is far below the Healthy People
2000 goal. In 1995, 59.4% of women in the United States were
breastfeeding either exclusively or in combination with formula feeding
at the time of hospital discharge; only 21.6% of mothers were nursing
at 6 months, and many of these were supplementing with
formula.60
The highest rates of breastfeeding are observed among higher-income,
college-educated women >30 years of age living in the Mountain and
Pacific regions of the United States.60 Obstacles to the
initiation and continuation of breastfeeding include physician apathy
and misinformation,61-63 insufficient prenatal
breastfeeding education,64 disruptive hospital
policies,65 inappropriate interruption of
breastfeeding,62 early hospital discharge in some
populations,66 lack of timely routine follow-up care and postpartum home health visits,67 maternal
employment68,69 (especially in the absence of workplace
facilities and support for breastfeeding),70 lack of broad
societal support,71 media portrayal of bottle-feeding as
normative,72 and commercial promotion of infant formula
through distribution of hospital discharge packs, coupons for free or
discounted formula, and television and general magazine
advertising.73,74
The AAP identifies breastfeeding as the ideal method of feeding and
nurturing infants and recognizes breastfeeding as primary in achieving
optimal infant and child health, growth, and development. The AAP
emphasizes the essential role of the pediatrician in promoting, protecting, and supporting breastfeeding and recommends the following breastfeeding policies.
![]()
HISTORY AND INTRODUCTION
![]()
THE NEED
![]()
THE PROBLEM
![]()
RECOMMENDED BREASTFEEDING PRACTICES
| |
ROLE OF PEDIATRICIANS IN PROMOTING AND PROTECTING BREASTFEEDING |
|---|
To provide an optimal environment for breastfeeding, pediatricians should follow these recommendations:
| |
CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although economic, cultural, and political pressures often confound decisions about infant feeding, the AAP firmly adheres to the position that breastfeeding ensures the best possible health as well as the best developmental and psychosocial outcomes for the infant. Enthusiastic support and involvement of pediatricians in the promotion and practice of breastfeeding is essential to the achievement of optimal infant and child health, growth, and development.
WORK GROUP ON BREASTFEEDING, 1996 TO 1997
Lawrence M. Gartner, MD, Chairperson
Linda Sue Black, MD
Antoinette P. Eaton, MD
Ruth A. Lawrence, MD
Audrey J. Naylor, MD, DrPH
Marianne E. Neifert, MD
Donna O'Hare, MD
Richard J. Schanler, MD
LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES
Michael Georgieff, MD
Committee on Nutrition
Yvette Piovanetti, MD
Committee on Community Health Services
John Queenan, MD
American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin deficiency: retrospective analysis of the influence of early breast- vs bottle-feeding.
JAMA.
1985;
253:2679-2682 [Abstract]
1-antitrypsin deficiency, and liver disease?
JAMA.
1985;
254:3036 Letter[CrossRef][Medline]
neglected but essential ingredient of breast-feeding.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am.
1987;
14:623-633 [Medline]
not really a necessity.
Arch Dis Child
1983;
58:73-74 [Medline] The following policy statement is a revision:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. R. Brundige, E. A. Maga, K. C. Klasing, and J. D. Murray Lysozyme Transgenic Goats' Milk Influences Gastrointestinal Morphology in Young Pigs J. Nutr., May 1, 2008; 138(5): 921 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Rosenberg, C. A. Eastham, L. J. Kasehagen, and A. P. Sandoval Marketing Infant Formula Through Hospitals: the Impact of Commercial Hospital Discharge Packs on Breastfeeding Am J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 98(2): 290 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Schwarz and A. L. O'Sullivan State of the Art Reviews: Intervening to Improve Outcomes for Adolescent Mothers and Their Children American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, December 1, 2007; 1(6): 482 - 489. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Karaolis-Danckert, A. L. Gunther, A. Kroke, C. Hornberg, and A. E Buyken How early dietary factors modify the effect of rapid weight gain in infancy on subsequent body-composition development in term children whose birth weight was appropriate for gestational age Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2007; 86(6): 1700 - 1708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Philipp, M. J. McMahon, S. Davies, T. Santos, and S. Jean-Marie Breastfeeding Information in Nursing Textbooks Needs Improvement J Hum Lact, November 1, 2007; 23(4): 345 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bentley-Lewis, A. B. Goldfine, D. E. Green, and E. W. Seely Lactation After Normal Pregnancy Is Not Associated With Blood Glucose Fluctuations Diabetes Care, November 1, 2007; 30(11): 2792 - 2793. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Vohr, B. B. Poindexter, A. M. Dusick, L. T. McKinley, R. D. Higgins, J. C. Langer, W. K. Poole, and for the National Institute of Child Health and Hum Persistent Beneficial Effects of Breast Milk Ingested in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit on Outcomes of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants at 30 Months of Age Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): e953 - e959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bronte-Tinkew, M. Zaslow, R. Capps, A. Horowitz, and M. McNamara Food Insecurity Works through Depression, Parenting, and Infant Feeding to Influence Overweight and Health in Toddlers J. Nutr., September 1, 2007; 137(9): 2160 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Viazis, B. E. Farkas, and J. C. Allen Effects of High-Pressure Processing on Immunoglobulin A and Lysozyme Activity in Human Milk J Hum Lact, August 1, 2007; 23(3): 253 - 261. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gainer, R. Massai, S. Lillo, V. Reyes, M.L. Forcelledo, R. Caviedes, C. Villarroel, and J. Bouyer Levonorgestrel pharmacokinetics in plasma and milk of lactating women who take 1.5 mg for emergency contraception Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1578 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Merewood, B. Patel, K. N. Newton, L. P. MacAuley, L. B. Chamberlain, P. Francisco, and S. D. Mehta Breastfeeding Duration Rates and Factors Affecting Continued Breastfeeding Among Infants Born at an Inner-City US Baby-Friendly Hospital J Hum Lact, May 1, 2007; 23(2): 157 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Gunderson, C. E. Lewis, G. S. Wei, R. A. Whitmer, C. P. Quesenberry, and S. Sidney Lactation and Changes in Maternal Metabolic Risk Factors Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2007; 109(3): 729 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Finkelstein, M. S Wahl, Y. Bentur, T. Schechter, B. Z. Garty, T. B Erickson, G. Chodick, A. Cahana, B. J Mounstephen, G. Koren, et al. Universal versus Selective Iron Supplementation for Infants and the Risk of Unintentional Poisoning in Young Children: A Comparative Study of Two Populations Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2007; 41(3): 414 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Giovannini, G. Radaelli, E. Riva, and G. Banderali Low Prepregnant Body Mass Index and Breastfeeding Practices J Hum Lact, February 1, 2007; 23(1): 44 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Bodnar, H. N. Simhan, R. W. Powers, M. P. Frank, E. Cooperstein, and J. M. Roberts High Prevalence of Vitamin D Insufficiency in Black and White Pregnant Women Residing in the Northern United States and Their Neonates J. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 137(2): 447 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pietz, B. Achanti, L. Lilien, E. C. Stepka, and S. K. Mehta Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: A 20-Year Experience Pediatrics, January 1, 2007; 119(1): e164 - e170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Paul, E. B. Lehman, C. S. Hollenbeak, and M. J. Maisels Preventable Newborn Readmissions Since Passage of the Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): 2349 - 2358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Ozdogan, M Iscan, C Ellikcioglu, and E Yildiz Hypernatraemic dehydration in breast-fed neonates. Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 1041 - 1041. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Der, G D. Batty, and I. J Deary Effect of breast feeding on intelligence in children: prospective study, sibling pairs analysis, and meta-analysis BMJ, November 4, 2006; 333(7575): 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Britton, H. L. Britton, and V. Gronwaldt Breastfeeding, Sensitivity, and Attachment Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): e1436 - e1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Johnston, C. E. Huebner, M. L. Anderson, L. T. Tyll, and R. S. Thompson Healthy Steps in an Integrated Delivery System: Child and Parent Outcomes at 30 Months Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2006; 160(8): 793 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Ziegler, B. W. Hollis, S. E. Nelson, and J. M. Jeter Vitamin D Deficiency in Breastfed Infants in Iowa Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): 603 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Merewood, L. B. Chamberlain, J. T. Cook, B. L. Philipp, K. Malone, and H. Bauchner The Effect of Peer Counselors on Breastfeeding Rates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2006; 160(7): 681 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Vohr, B. B. Poindexter, A. M. Dusick, L. T. McKinley, L. L. Wright, J. C. Langer, W. K. Poole, and for the NICHD Neonatal Research Network Beneficial Effects of Breast Milk in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit on the Developmental Outcome of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants at 18 Months of Age Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): e115 - e123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|