|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Initiation or Withdrawal of Treatment for High-Risk Newborns
Committee on Fetus and Newborn, 1994 to 1995
As medical technology has advanced, outcomes for high-risk newborns have greatly improved. With advanced technology such as assisted ventilation, it is now possible to keep some terminal, severely ill, or extremely premature infants alive for long periods of time. The result of such treatment is that dying may be prolonged or that the infant will survive with profound neurologic or other debilitating problems.1 The medical treatment of infants should be based on what is in their best interest. However, because the infant's "best interest" is not always clear, parents and health care givers are often faced with difficult treatment decisions when faced with the situation of a severely ill, extremely premature, or terminally ill infant.
The Treatment Dilemma
If intensive treatment uniformly resulted in saving infants at risk, it would be the obvious choice for all severely ill infants. This outcome, of course, does not always occur. If intensive treatment is not provided to very ill infants, most of them will die, but some may survive with significant neurodevelopmental disability, in part because specific treatments were withheld. The following dilemma therefore exists: intensive treatment of all severely ill infants sometimes results in prolongation of dying or occasionally iatrogenic illness; nonintensive treatment results in increased mortality and unnecessary morbidity. The overall outcomes of either approach are disappointing.
Strategy for Care
A reasonably acceptable approach to this dilemma is an individualized prognostic strategy.2,3 In this setting, care is provided for the individual infant at the appropriate level based on the expected outcome at the time care is initiated.
The following policy statement is a revision:
- Noninitiation or Withdrawal of Intensive Care for High-Risk Newborns
- Committee on Fetus and Newborn
Pediatrics 2007 119: 401-403.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  L. M. Kopelman The Best Interests Standard for Incompetent or Incapacitated Persons of All Ages J. Law Med. Ethics, March 1, 2007; 35(1): 187 - 196. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. J. Mears Treatment Decisions for Disabled Infants: Balancing Benefits & Burdens AAP Grand Rounds, December 1, 2006; 16(6): 66 - 67. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D Wilkinson Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die? J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2006; 32(8): 454 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Clark Baby Doe Rules: In Reply Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1601 - 1601. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Hurst Baby Doe Rules Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1600 - 1601. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Kopelman Baby Doe Rules Have Been Interpreted and Applied by an Appellate Court: In Reply Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): 514 - 515. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Kopelman Are the 21-Year-Old Baby Doe Rules Misunderstood or Mistaken? Pediatrics, March 1, 2005; 115(3): 797 - 802. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow-up Care of High-Risk Infants Pediatrics, November 1, 2004; 114(5/S1): 1377 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. P. Halamek Prenatal Consultation at the Limits of Viability NeoReviews, June 1, 2003; 4(6): e153 - 156. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. C. Moore, K. Coker, A. B. DuBuisson, B. Swett, and W. H. Edwards Implementing Potentially Better Practices for Improving Family-Centered Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Successes and Challenges Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 111(4): e450 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. H. Levi Withdrawing Nutrition and Hydration from Children: Legal, Ethical, and Professional Issues Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2003; 42(2): 139 - 145. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. H. Levi Ethical Conflicts Between Residents and Attending Physicians Clinical Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 41(9): 659 - 667. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Pierucci, R. S. Kirby, and S. R. Leuthner End-of-Life Care for Neonates and Infants: The Experience and Effects of a Palliative Care Consultation Service Pediatrics, September 1, 2001; 108(3): 653 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. L. Falik No easy answers in care of premature infants: Best' interest tough to define AAP News, November 1, 2000; 17(5): 187 - 194. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|