This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) This Policy is No Longer Valid. An erratum has been published Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Committee on Medical Liability, Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Committee on Medical Liability,

PEDIATRICS Vol. 109 No. 5 May 2002, pp. 974-979

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

Guidelines for Expert Witness Testimony in Medical Malpractice Litigation

Committee on Medical Liability

The interests of the public and the medical profession are best served when scientifically sound and unbiased expert witness testimony is readily available to plaintiffs and defendants in medical negligence suits. As members of the physician community, as patient advocates, and as private citizens, pediatricians have ethical and professional obligations to assist in the administration of justice, particularly in matters concerning potential medical malpractice. The American Academy of Pediatrics believes that the adoption of the recommendations outlined in this statement will improve the quality of medical expert witness testimony in such proceedings and thereby increase the probability of achieving equitable outcomes. Strategies to enforce ethical guidelines should be monitored for efficacy before offering policy recommendations on disciplining physicians for providing biased, false, or unscientific medical expert witness testimony.

Abbreviations: AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Fallat, J. Glover, and the Committee on Bioethics Professionalism in Pediatrics Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): e1123 - e1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Bonow, D. P. Zipes, J. L. Anderson, M. D. Cheitlin, L. B. Goldstein, A. O. Grant, D. Faxon, J. A.C. Lima, and R. M. Robertson Task force 5: Expert testimony and opinions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1747 - 1749. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Bonow, D. P. Zipes, J. L. Anderson, M. D. Cheitlin, L. B. Goldstein, A. O. Grant, D. Faxon, J. A. C. Lima, and R. M. Robertson Task Force 5: Expert Testimony and Opinions Circulation, October 19, 2004; 110(16): 2535 - 2537. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Milunsky Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Experts: The Abrogation of Responsibility by Specialty Organizations and a Call for Action J Child Neurol, June 1, 2003; 18(6): 413 - 419. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. J. Wenner Jr and C. H. Deitschel Jr Unreliable Medical Experts Pediatrics, March 1, 2003; 111(3): 711 - 711. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. N. McAbee Reining in experts could reduce litigation costs AAP News, May 1, 2002; 20(5): 208 - 208. [Full Text] [PDF]