This policy has been revised by the policy posted on July 1, 2009.

POLICY STATEMENT

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Committee on Medical Liability
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Committee on Medical Liability,

PEDIATRICS Vol. 109 No. 5 May 2002, pp. 974-979

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

Guidelines for Expert Witness Testimony in Medical Malpractice Litigation

Committee on Medical Liability

The interests of the public and the medical profession are best served when scientifically sound and unbiased expert witness testimony is readily available to plaintiffs and defendants in medical negligence suits. As members of the physician community, as patient advocates, and as private citizens, pediatricians have ethical and professional obligations to assist in the administration of justice, particularly in matters concerning potential medical malpractice. The American Academy of Pediatrics believes that the adoption of the recommendations outlined in this statement will improve the quality of medical expert witness testimony in such proceedings and thereby increase the probability of achieving equitable outcomes. Strategies to enforce ethical guidelines should be monitored for efficacy before offering policy recommendations on disciplining physicians for providing biased, false, or unscientific medical expert witness testimony.

Abbreviations: AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics


The following policy statement is a revision:

Expert Witness Participation in Civil and Criminal Proceedings
Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management
Pediatrics 2009 124: 428-438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management
Expert Witness Participation in Civil and Criminal Proceedings
Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): 428 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. E. Fallat, J. Glover, and the Committee on Bioethics
Professionalism in Pediatrics
Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): e1123 - e1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, D. P. Zipes, J. L. Anderson, M. D. Cheitlin, L. B. Goldstein, A. O. Grant, D. Faxon, J. A.C. Lima, and R. M. Robertson
Task force 5: Expert testimony and opinions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1747 - 1749.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
R. O. Bonow, D. P. Zipes, J. L. Anderson, M. D. Cheitlin, L. B. Goldstein, A. O. Grant, D. Faxon, J. A. C. Lima, and R. M. Robertson
Task Force 5: Expert Testimony and Opinions
Circulation, October 19, 2004; 110(16): 2535 - 2537.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Child NeurolHome page
A. Milunsky
Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Experts: The Abrogation of Responsibility by Specialty Organizations and a Call for Action
J Child Neurol, June 1, 2003; 18(6): 413 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
W. J. Wenner Jr and C. H. Deitschel Jr
Unreliable Medical Experts
Pediatrics, March 1, 2003; 111(3): 711 - 711.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AAP NewsHome page
G. N. McAbee
Reining in experts could reduce litigation costs
AAP News, May 1, 2002; 20(5): 208 - 208.
[Full Text] [PDF]